Case 29.1: Bosse v. Brinker Restaurant Corporation
In the ebook, read Case 29.1: Bosse v. Brinker Restaurant Corporation, d.b.a. Chili’s Grill and Bar on pp. 489-490
Answer the following questions:
what does the doctrine of respondent superior provide?
why do you think the plaintiffs sued Chili’s? Do you think they had a very good chance of winning the lawsuit against Chili’s?
Did the elements exist to make the restaurant patron an agent of Chili’s restaurant? Explain. Is the restaurant patron liable?
What is your opinion of the outcome of the case? Do you agree or disagree with the ruling? Please explain.
Write a two page 500 word paper answering the questions in #2.
Why do you think the plaintiffs sued Chili’s? Do you think they had a very good chance of winning the lawsuit against Chili’s?
