Does section 1(2) of the Flood Compensation Act prevent Helen from seeking judicial review of the decision of the Flood Compensation Tribunal?
This is a section of an entire essay (part answer to a scenario that I have attached in files)
S.1 (2): “Decisions of the FCT, including decisions as to its jurisdiction, are final and conclusive and may not questioned in any court of law.”
Summarise and explain the legal position as it applies to the scenario, indicating the authorities on which it is based and pointing out any areas of uncertainty or ambiguity
Highlight, where relevant, any outstanding issues, questions, etc, summarising their significance.
it needs to be OSCOLA referenced but no bibliography is needed
Does section 1(2) of the Flood Compensation Act prevent Helen from seeking judicial review of the decision of the Flood Compensation Tribunal?