PHIL 223: Medical Ethics
Critique Paper Assignment

Write a 2 – 4 page critique of one of the assigned readings. If you disagree with the author, what is wrong with his or her argument?  If you generally agree with the author, yet you think the argument could be better, in what way could it be better?

The Assignment:

The paper should contain the following elements:

Your critique of the argument. You want to respond critically. This is the most important part of your paper.

Here are some examples of critical responses:

(a) Argue that the author does not adequately defend a premise in the argument.

(b) Argue that one of the author’s premises is false.

(c) Argue that the author could have made a stronger argument in defense of her/his argument.

(d) Anticipate and respond to an objection to the author’s argument. (Note, the objection must be one the author does not consider.)

(e) Discuss the implications of the author’s view. These implications may be favorable or unfavorable.

There are other possible ways to respond critically to an assigned reading — these are just examples.

Make sure you develop your critique. A paper containing one or two thoughtfully explained criticisms is better than one containing several under-explained or under-defended criticisms.

Note that saying that you agree with the author and that her/his argument is good does not constitute a critical analysis or evaluation. You need to do more than that.