Global Political Risk Discussion: Post #4
Country: Egypt
Post (1): provide a 200-300-word thoughtful reaction to a selected contemporaneous article.
For a superb/quality post, the analysis must endeavor to connect the contemporaneous event/development to as many as possible of the following:
at least one of the definitions of Political Risk
salient course concepts
course lectures/lecture slides
assigned/required course readings
implications for the business community
“personal” experience (direct or vicarious, where applicable)
build on (rather than regurgitate) earlier posts in the discussion thread
furnish reference information for all applicable/additional research/sources
The post should provide your own thoughtful and informed “so what?” (critical thinking) analysis of the event/development.
Be sure to reflect on at least their implications for business (manager, entrepreneur, enterprise, market, customer, client, supplier, investment, etc.) and other non-state actors.
Besides the first reaction/analysis on a featured article, subsequent reactions should endeavor to reference (i.e., build on) earlier reactions to the selected article. Consider asking questions, elaborating on a point in earlier posts, suggesting other possible arguments, or suggesting other examples.
As a general guideline, posts should be well-developed, use proper spelling, grammar, and punctuation.
