Power and graphic organizer
Edit the essay below, do a graphic organizer and power point on this essay and give 3 or 4 for examples on each type of leadership in the army on your own words.
According to Olayisade & Awolusi (2021), leadership has proved to be a very significant factor in the success of any organization. The army sector employs various leadership aspects essential to their missions’ success. In the military, “leadership styles” refers to the many methods and approaches used by military officers and commanders to guide their subordinates toward achieving a common goal. Leadership is crucial to the army’s operation since it is hierarchical. Several leadership ideologies have emerged, each with unique benefits and demerits. The nature of the task, the troops’ degree of experience, the commander’s character, and their leadership philosophies are a few elements that influence the decision of which leadership style to use (Stănciulescu & Beldiman, 2019). Furthermore, Leadership styles refers to the different ways in which leaders can exercise their influence over others. Each style has its own advantages and disadvantages, and the most effective leaders can adapt their style to the situation at hand. Leadership refers to the ability of an individual to influence, motivate, and guide others towards a common goal or objective. There are many different leadership styles, each with their own unique characteristics and strengths. The purpose of this essay is to define Leadership Styles, and how they each apply to the United States Army and what their strengths and weaknesses are.
There are many different leadership styles, and each can be effective in different situations. An Autocratic leadership, also known as authoritarian leadership, make decisions on their own without input from subordinates. This style can be effective in situations where quick decisions or action is necessary to be taken, such as in combat situations leader may give orders without consulting the juniors. However, it can also lead to dislike and decreased confidence between subordinates who cannot share their opinions. Whereas, A democratic leader, also known as participative leadership or shared leadership, encourages input from subordinates and makes decisions based on group agreement or opinions. Such as, when leadership offers junior noncommissioned officers or soldiers the highest level of freedom to speak up and share their opinions or concerts. Such as, during preparing works out, where collaboration and participation are fundamental. However, However, it can also lead to indecision and a lack of clear direction if the group is unable to come to an agreement. For example, losing their military bearing and start disrespecting between them.
A transformational leader inspires and motivates subordinates to work towards a common goal, focus on helping members of the group support one another and provide them with the support, guidance, and inspiration they need to work hard, perform well, and stay loyal to the group. Moreover, transformational leaders do not micromanage their soldiers instead of they ask or give for feedbacks so they can improve, do better and success on their task. This style can be effective in situations where there is a need for creativity and innovation, such as in developing new tactics or strategies. However, it can also be less effective in situations where a clear direction and a focus on task completion is necessary because this type of leadership requires an elevated degree of expertise and experience. It might likewise prompt ridiculous assumptions if they are not carried out accurately.
Laissez-Faire Leadership This initiative is described as a hands-off way to deal with initiative, with subordinates given high independence. This authority style is often utilized in circumstances where subordinates have experience. This authority is often utilized in the military when subordinates are exceptionally prepared and experienced (Kanwal, Lodhi & Kashif, 2019). However, this type of leadership is rarely employed in the army since it might create chaos and confusion when there is much strain. Still, this leadership style may be suitable when troops are well-trained and skilled and the leader respects their judgment. A Special Forces squad engaged in a clandestine mission with a high degree of troop autonomy would be an illustration of this (Olayisade & Awolusi, 2021). For example, It may occur in cases when the leader at the top delegates roles and the decision main process to the juniors without conducting oversight.
a servant leader, a popular style in the army, focuses on the needs of subordinates and works to support and empower them. This style can be effective in creating a culture of teamwork and mutual support, which can be especially important in the military. However, it can also lead to a lack of clear direction and accountability if the leader is too focused on meeting the needs of others. This style can be effective in creating a culture of teamwork and mutual support, which can be especially important in the military. However, it can also lead to a lack of clear direction and accountability if the leader is too focused on meeting the needs of others.
In conclusion, there are many different leadership styles. The most effective leadership style in the US Army will depend on the situation and the needs of the unit. A good leader will be able to adapt their style as needed to ensure that they are meeting the needs of their subordinates and achieving the mission objectives.
Work Cited:
https://emeritus.org/in/learn/different-types-of-leadership/
Olayisade, A., & Awolusi, O. D. (2021). The Effect of Leadership Styles on Employee’s Productivity in the Nigerian Oil and Gas Industry. Information Management and Business Review, 13(1 (I)), 47-64.https://ojs.amhinternational.com/index.php/imbr/article/view/3194
