As a judge, would you permit the prosecution to present testimony by a bloodstain pattern analyst or “expert”? If you would admit the testimony, would it be permitted with limitations or warnings?

Wk 2 DB

READ:
https://www.ncjrs.gov/pdffiles1/nij/grants/247180.pdf

RESOURCES:
https://www.law.cornell.edu/wex/daubert_standard
https://www.law.cornell.edu/wex/frye_standard
http://legal-dictionary.thefreedictionary.com/

You must post an original post of 100-300 words

As a judge, would you permit the prosecution to present testimony by a bloodstain pattern analyst or “expert”?
If you would admit the testimony, would it be permitted with limitations or warnings?
If you would not permit the introduction of testimony by a bloodstain pattern analyst, why not?
Use the legal standards in Frye and Daubert as the foundation of your decision to permit or deny admission.

As a judge, would you permit the prosecution to present testimony by a bloodstain pattern analyst or “expert”? If you would admit the testimony, would it be permitted with limitations or warnings?
Scroll to top