Not Applicable Marginal Good
1. On each page: Student Name, ID Number, Course Number, Course Title, and Unit Number.
2. Responses typed, using a standard font, 12-point type size, double-spaced, with overall neatness and readability.
3. Restatement of the question and question number (exactly as stated in the Study Guide).
Writing Assignment Evaluation
Not Accepted Poor Marginal Good Very Good
1. Student used standard essay format: Introduction/Body/Conclusion. The structure is a multi-paragraph essay, clearly developed with effective transitions and solid topic sentences.
2. Student demonstrated an in-depth understanding of the ideas in the assigned reading and critically evaluates/responds to those ideas in an analytical persuasive manner (i.e. graduate level).
3. Student was able to respond clearly and directly to the assignment in an academic manner with good development. The essay indicates a good understanding of the course content and supports its points with textual and outside references.
4. Student demonstrated the use of critical thinking while making novel connections to outside materials and experiences. Analysis is fresh, posing new ways to think of the material.
5. Student demonstrated proper use of grammar, spelling, punctuation, citation style, etc. Writing consistently adheres to A.P.A formatting.
Answer the following question:
Define and examine the purpose of job evaluations. Describe the various job evaluation methods.
Explain the different steps in the job ranking method. Assess some potential drawbacks of the job ranking method.
