Comparing and contrasting various perspectives for defining and evaluating personalities.
The purpose of the article was to compare and contrast different perspectives for defining and evaluating personality. Based on the conducted analysis, it can be concluded that there are multiple perspectives for defining and evaluating personalities, making personality one of the critical topics of interest in psychology.
Many theories of personality exist, and the major of the major ones fall into one of the four crucial perspectives. All these perspectives on personality try to describe various patterns in the field of personality, including how these patterns build and how individuals vary on a personal level.
The article concludes that the most prominent psychanalytic perspectives theorist are Karen Horney, Alfred Adler, Carl Jung, Erick Erikson, and Sigmund Freud(cherry,2018). These article compares and contrasts four different perspectives: humanistic perspective, psychoanalytic perspective, socio cognitive perspective, and trait perspective.
The humanistic perspective of personality concentrates on psychological development, personal awareness, and free will. It requires an extra positive outlook on the nature of humans and is based in how individuals can attain their potential.
On the other hand, the trait perspective focuses on identifying, explaining, and measuring the particular traits that build human personality.
By knowing the traits, examiners believe they can comprehend the various between people in a better way. In contrast, the sociology cognitive perspective highlights the usefulness of observational studies, cognitive process, situational influences, and self-efficacy. Finally, the psychoanalytic perspective highlights the benefits of the experience of early childhood and unconscious thoughts .
