An essay critically discussing the tension of the neutrality of a liberal state and human rights with religious identity.
The cases in the question don’t seem to grasp the importance of religious identity and seem to say that religious identity must give way to other human rights.
There should be a discussion on whether human rights can form the basis for identity seeing as it’s not traditionally intense according to Max Weber, and given that they are universalistic principles, in comparison to religious identity. Please discuss the language of the cases and how they fail to adequately grasp religious identity.
Issue of how identity is now dividing the British polity (rather than class) and the rise of identity politics and diversity as a challenge for liberal democracies.
